NWIPB OpenIR
Predicting invasion in grassland ecosystems: is exotic dominance the real embarrassment of richness?
Seabloom, Eric W.1; Borer, Elizabeth T.1; Buckley, Yvonne2; Cleland, Elsa E.3; Davies, Kendi4; Firn, Jennifer5; Harpole, W. Stanley6; Hautier, Yann1,7; Lind, Eric1; Macdougall, Andrew8; Orrock, John L.9; Prober, Suzanne M.10; Adler, Peter11,12; Alberti, Juan13; Anderson, T. Michael14; Bakker, Jonathan D.15; Biederman, Lori A.6; Blumenthal, Dana16; Brown, Cynthia S.17; Brudvig, Lars A.18; Caldeira, Maria19; Chu, Chengjin20; Crawley, Michael J.21; Daleo, Pedro13; Damschen, Ellen I.9; D'Antonio, Carla M.22; Decrappeo, Nicole M.23; Dickman, Chris R.24; Du, Guozhen20; Fay, Philip A.25; Frater, Paul6; Gruner, Daniel S.26; Hagenah, Nicole27,28; Hector, Andrew7; Helm, Aveliina29; Hillebrand, Helmut30; Hofmockel, Kirsten S.6; Humphries, Hope C.31; Iribarne, Oscar13; Jin, Virginia L.32; Kay, Adam33; Kirkman, Kevin P.27; Klein, Julia A.34; Knops, Johannes M. H.35; La Pierre, Kimberly J.28; Ladwig, Laura M.36; Lambrinos, John G.37; Leakey, Andrew D. B.38,39; Li, Qi40; Li, Wei41; Mcculley, Rebecca42; Melbourne, Brett4; Mitchell, Charles E.43; Moore, Joslin L.44; Morgan, John45; Mortensen, Brent6; O'Halloran, Lydia R.46; Paertel, Meelis29; Pascual, Jesus13; Pyke, David A.23; Risch, Anita C.47; Salguero-Gomez, Roberto2; Sankaran, Mahesh48; Schuetz, Martin47; Simonsen, Anna49; Smith, Melinda50; Stevens, Carly51; Sullivan, Lauren6; Wardle, Glenda M.24; Wolkovich, Elizabeth M.52; Wragg, Peter D.1; Wright, Justin53; Yang, Louie54; Seabloom, EW (reprint author), Univ MN, Dept Ecol Evolut & Behav, St Paul, MN 55108 USA.
2013-12-01
发表期刊GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
ISSN1354-1013
卷号19期号:12页码:3677-3687
文章类型Article
摘要Invasions have increased the size of regional species pools, but are typically assumed to reduce native diversity. However, global-scale tests of this assumption have been elusive because of the focus on exotic species richness, rather than relative abundance. This is problematic because low invader richness can indicate invasion resistance by the native community or, alternatively, dominance by a single exotic species. Here, we used a globally replicated study to quantify relationships between exotic richness and abundance in grass-dominated ecosystems in 13 countries on six continents, ranging from salt marshes to alpine tundra. We tested effects of human land use, native community diversity, herbivore pressure, and nutrient limitation on exotic plant dominance. Despite its widespread use, exotic richness was a poor proxy for exotic dominance at low exotic richness, because sites that contained few exotic species ranged from relatively pristine (low exotic richness and cover) to almost completely exotic-dominated ones (low exotic richness but high exotic cover). Both exotic cover and richness were predicted by native plant diversity (native grass richness) and land use (distance to cultivation). Although climate was important for predicting both exotic cover and richness, climatic factors predicting cover (precipitation variability) differed from those predicting richness (maximum temperature and mean temperature in the wettest quarter). Herbivory and nutrient limitation did not predict exotic richness or cover. Exotic dominance was greatest in areas with low native grass richness at the site- or regional-scale. Although this could reflect native grass displacement, a lack of biotic resistance is a more likely explanation, given that grasses comprise the most aggressive invaders. These findings underscore the need to move beyond richness as a surrogate for the extent of invasion, because this metric confounds monodominance with invasion resistance. Monitoring species' relative abundance will more rapidly advance our understanding of invasions.; Invasions have increased the size of regional species pools, but are typically assumed to reduce native diversity. However, global-scale tests of this assumption have been elusive because of the focus on exotic species richness, rather than relative abundance. This is problematic because low invader richness can indicate invasion resistance by the native community or, alternatively, dominance by a single exotic species. Here, we used a globally replicated study to quantify relationships between exotic richness and abundance in grass-dominated ecosystems in 13 countries on six continents, ranging from salt marshes to alpine tundra. We tested effects of human land use, native community diversity, herbivore pressure, and nutrient limitation on exotic plant dominance. Despite its widespread use, exotic richness was a poor proxy for exotic dominance at low exotic richness, because sites that contained few exotic species ranged from relatively pristine (low exotic richness and cover) to almost completely exotic-dominated ones (low exotic richness but high exotic cover). Both exotic cover and richness were predicted by native plant diversity (native grass richness) and land use (distance to cultivation). Although climate was important for predicting both exotic cover and richness, climatic factors predicting cover (precipitation variability) differed from those predicting richness (maximum temperature and mean temperature in the wettest quarter). Herbivory and nutrient limitation did not predict exotic richness or cover. Exotic dominance was greatest in areas with low native grass richness at the site- or regional-scale. Although this could reflect native grass displacement, a lack of biotic resistance is a more likely explanation, given that grasses comprise the most aggressive invaders. These findings underscore the need to move beyond richness as a surrogate for the extent of invasion, because this metric confounds monodominance with invasion resistance. Monitoring species' relative abundance will more rapidly advance our understanding of invasions.
WOS标题词Science & Technology ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine
DOI10.1111/gcb.12370
关键词[WOS]BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS ; PLANT INVASIONS ; UNITED-STATES ; SPECIES INVASIONS ; COMMUNITIES ; COMPETITION ; CALIFORNIA ; PATTERNS ; IMPACTS ; CONSERVATION
收录类别SCI
语种英语
项目资助者Nutrient Network ; National Science Foundation Research Coordination Network(NSF-DEB-1042132) ; Long Term Ecological Research program(NSF-DEB-1234162) ; Institute on the Environment(DG-0001-13)
WOS研究方向Biodiversity & Conservation ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
WOS类目Biodiversity Conservation ; Ecology ; Environmental Sciences
WOS记录号WOS:000326836000011
引用统计
被引频次:68[WOS]   [WOS记录]     [WOS相关记录]
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://210.75.249.4/handle/363003/3896
专题中国科学院西北高原生物研究所
通讯作者Seabloom, EW (reprint author), Univ MN, Dept Ecol Evolut & Behav, St Paul, MN 55108 USA.
作者单位1.Univ MN, Dept Ecol Evolut & Behav, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
2.Univ Queensland, Sch Biol Sci, ARC Ctr Excellence Environm Decis, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
3.Univ Calif San Diego, Ecol Behav & Evolut Sect, San Diego, CA 92093 USA
4.Univ Colorado, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
5.Queensland Univ Technol, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
6.Iowa State Univ, Dept Ecol Evolut & Organismal Biol, Ames, IA 50011 USA
7.Univ Zurich, Inst Evolutionary Biol & Environm Studies, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
8.Univ Guelph, Dept Integrat Biol, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
9.Univ Wisconsin, Dept Zool, Madison, WI 53706 USA
10.CSIRO Ecosyst Sci, Wembley, WA 6913, Australia
11.Utah State Univ, Dept Wildland Resources, Logan, UT 84322 USA
12.Utah State Univ, Ctr Ecol, Logan, UT 84322 USA
13.Inst Invest Marinas & Costeras UNMdP CONICET, Mar Del Plata, Argentina
14.Wake Forest Univ, Dept Biol, Winston Salem, NC 27109 USA
15.Univ Washington, Sch Environm & Forest Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
16.USDA ARS, Rangeland Resources Res Unit, Ft Collins, CO 80526 USA
17.Colorado State Univ, Dept Bioagr Sci & Pest Management, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
18.Michigan State Univ, Dept Plant Biol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
19.Univ Tecn Lisboa, Inst Super Agron, Ctr Estudos Florestais, P-1100 Lisbon, Portugal
20.Lanzhou Univ, Sch Life Sci, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
21.Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Biol, Ascot SL5 7PY, Berks, England
22.Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Ecol Evolut & Marine Biol, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
23.US Geol Survey, Forest & Rangeland Ecosyst Sci Ctr, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
24.Univ Sydney, Sch Biol Sci, Desert Ecol Res Grp, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
25.USDA ARS, Grassland Soil & Water Res Lab, Temple, TX 76502 USA
26.Univ Maryland, Dept Entomol, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
27.Univ KwaZulu Natal, Sch Life Sci, ZA-3209 Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
28.Yale Univ, Dept Ecol, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
29.Univ Tartu, Inst Ecol & Earth Sci, EE-50090 Tartu, Estonia
30.Carl von Ossietzky Univ Oldenburg, Inst Chem & Biol Marine Environm, Wilhelmshaven, Germany
31.Univ Colorado, INSTAAR, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
32.USDA ARS, Agroecosyst Management Res Unit, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
33.Univ St Thomas, Dept Biol, St Paul, MN 55105 USA
34.Colorado State Univ, Dept Forest Rangeland & Watershed Stewardship, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
35.Univ Nebraska, Sch Biol Sci, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
36.Univ New Mexico, Dept Biol, Albuquerque, NM 87103 USA
37.Oregon State Univ, Dept Hort, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
38.Univ Illinois, Dept Plant Biol, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
39.Univ Illinois, Inst Genom Biol, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
40.Chinese Acad Sci, Northwest Inst Plateau Biol, Key Lab Adaptat & Evolut Plateau Biota, Xining 810008, Qinghai, Peoples R China
41.Southwest Forestry Univ, Yunnan Acad Biodivers, Kunming 650224, Peoples R China
42.Univ Kentucky, Dept Plant & Soil Sci, Lexington, KY 40546 USA
43.Univ N Carolina, Dept Biol, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
44.Univ Melbourne, Sch Bot, Australian Res Ctr Urban Ecol, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
45.La Trobe Univ, Dept Bot, Bundoora, Vic 3086, Australia
46.Oregon State Univ, Dept Zool, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
47.Swiss Fed Inst Forest Snow & Landscape Res, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
48.Natl Ctr Biol Sci, Bangalore 560065, Karnataka, India
49.Univ Toronto, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Toronto, ON M5S 3B2, Canada
50.Colorado State Univ, Dept Biol, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
51.Univ Lancaster, Lancaster Environm Ctr, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, England
52.Univ British Columbia, Biodivers Res Ctr, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
53.Duke Univ, Dept Biol, Durham, NC 27708 USA
54.Univ Calif Davis, Dept Entomol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Seabloom, Eric W.,Borer, Elizabeth T.,Buckley, Yvonne,et al. Predicting invasion in grassland ecosystems: is exotic dominance the real embarrassment of richness?[J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY,2013,19(12):3677-3687.
APA Seabloom, Eric W..,Borer, Elizabeth T..,Buckley, Yvonne.,Cleland, Elsa E..,Davies, Kendi.,...&Seabloom, EW .(2013).Predicting invasion in grassland ecosystems: is exotic dominance the real embarrassment of richness?.GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY,19(12),3677-3687.
MLA Seabloom, Eric W.,et al."Predicting invasion in grassland ecosystems: is exotic dominance the real embarrassment of richness?".GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY 19.12(2013):3677-3687.
条目包含的文件 下载所有文件
文件名称/大小 文献类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
Predicting invasion (1339KB) 开放获取CC BY-NC-SA浏览 下载
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Seabloom, Eric W.]的文章
[Borer, Elizabeth T.]的文章
[Buckley, Yvonne]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Seabloom, Eric W.]的文章
[Borer, Elizabeth T.]的文章
[Buckley, Yvonne]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Seabloom, Eric W.]的文章
[Borer, Elizabeth T.]的文章
[Buckley, Yvonne]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: Predicting invasion in grassland ecosystems is exotic.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。